Tuesday, March 31, 2020

QUCS Studio vs ADS 2016. Performances Comparison


In the following entry of the blog, the comparison between the performance of QUCS Studio, as RF and microwave simulation tool, and ADS 2016 from Keysight, is shown.
It is known, worldwide, that ADS has been the corner stone of the simulation CAD tools, for more than thirty years. It has been, and it will be in the near future, the mirror where all the competitors want of will want to be reflected in.

In order to get an accurate idea of what are the capabilities of QUCS Studio in terms of simulating RF and microwave circuits, the best comparison will be the one that compares the suite with the best ECAD tool available in the market.

Since the most relevant design area that ADS has historically been focused in is the RF and microwave circuits, this will be the type of circuits that will be compared to the equivalent simulated in QUCS Studio.
The document is arranged as a list of microstrip circuit examples, very commonly used in many of the high frequency designs that are analyzed using both CAD tools.
For each example, the main relevant performances are compared. Transmission parameter, reflection parameter mainly.

A brief explanation of the activity is summarized in the following document:  


All the files used in the making of this document are included in the following link, arranged as a QUCS Studio project.